On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>> I think it was me who added this. An easy fix would be to define a private
>> ares_in6_addr structure.
>
> Yes right, that would work if we made a 'ares_in6_addr' struct
> unconditonally instead. The only thing that struct me is that we then risk
> actually changing the struct (ABI) for systems that for some reason have a
> different in6_addr struct and already run c-ares IPv6 enabled.
Ok, this is how I proceeded now and I've committed a fix that makes us use the
private struct only.
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2009-01-14