This month's Index
Subject: Re: c-ares API vs c-ares source code provided functions (Win32 recommended reading)
Re: c-ares API vs c-ares source code provided functions (Win32 recommended reading)
From: Yang Tse <yangsita_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 20:36:54 +0100
2009/11/3, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Yang Tse wrote:
I don't have that information, but affected users would be in the
Avira folks reading the mailing list?
Unless others speak up, we won't have a clue relative to if these
Yep, and using it as "source code provided" is quite clean.
> > Conditional c-ares API or c-ares source code provided functions?
Yes, of course, there's also the option of adding them unconditionally
But either way I have no strong position on either side.
-- -=[Yang]=-Received on 2009-11-03