On Fri, 12 Nov 2010, Patrik Thunström wrote:
> In the end of september i brought up that the adig parsing/displaying of
> NAPTR replies wasn't correct, and submitted a patch to the list, which
> hasn't received any feedback. It's a small 1 line change, which should be
> easily verified.
Thanks, I've committed and pushed this now.
> In the same email as the patch, I also queried whether there was of any
> interest with a ares_parse_naptr procedure or if this would only bloat
> c-ares, as I'm assuming we're in quite the minority actually using naptr
> records (seeing that they're for a quite specific use case). If of any
> interest I can submit the routines we're using.
I'm open for what people think. My gut feeling is that it is a feature that
belongs in c-ares to make it more complete as a DNS library, so if there's no
objection and you provide a patch... :-)
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2010-11-12