On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, codemastr wrote:
> I think you might have misunderstood. The system is fully backwards
> compatible.
Oh, sorry for not checking my facts properly before replying.
> Well file based lookups aren't in the patch yet, however, I should have an
> updated patch today that does support file lookups as well as some basic OS
> independence (still no Windows support).
I've previously tried to find a good, small DNS server to rewrite/patch for
the purpose of setting up tests for c-ares, but so far I've failed. It would
be handy, but I guess we can live without one a bit longer as we've done quite
good this far...
> Also I had a question, maybe someone knows the answer to this. In
> /etc/resolv.conf, how does the sortlist apply to IPv6? I tried using google,
> and every single man page I found for resolv.conf includes the exact same
> sample: "sortlist 130.155.160.0/255.255.240.0 130.155.0.0" note the lack of
> any example using IPv6. Also, the man pages state that it uses netmasks,
> well IPv6 doesn't, instead you have CIDR.
I don't know, but I would assume that you'd simply use "0::ffff/64" style for
IPv6.
I don't think sortlist is very commonly used, and especially not for ipv6.
--
-=- Daniel Stenberg -=- http://daniel.haxx.se -=-
ech`echo xiun|tr nu oc|sed 'sx\([sx]\)\([xoi]\)xo un\2\1 is xg'`ol
_______________________________________________
http://cool.haxx.se/mailman/listinfo/c-ares
Received on Wed Mar 9 00:46:13 2005