Subject: Re: c-ares performance

Re: c-ares performance

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:12:05 +0200 (CEST)

On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, chirag patel wrote:

> I am still using ares-1.1.1

I really can't think of a good reason to stick with that version. c-ares is
truly a step forwards in all areas, so even if you don't want the new stuff
we've added, we still have fixed numerous bugs since the fork.. 

-- 
   c-ares -- my preferred DNS asynch resolver library
Received on 2007-09-17