Subject: Re: [PATCH] introducing millisecond timeout resolution

Re: [PATCH] introducing millisecond timeout resolution

From: Yang Tse <yangsita_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 14:15:40 +0200

2008/5/15, Yang Tse wrote:

> Looking more closely I think that we are breaking ares_timeout(), it
> has to return a time difference or timeout value to next timeout, not
> the time of the next timeout per se. Otherwise we would break ABI.

Daniel, verify if the attached patch is the proper thing to do.

-- 
-=[Yang]=-

Received on 2008-05-15