Subject: Re: Wireshark, but...

Re: Wireshark, but...

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:33:37 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Jaap Keuter wrote:

> I'm (partially) to blame for c-ares being used in the development version of
> Wireshark. Indeed there was some discussion, but from the few alternatives I
> suggested this one came out on top easily. So, Gerald Combs made the bold
> move and simply replaced ADNS with c-ares.

I'm always happy to see new users of c-ares! I think it'll lead to us getting
a better product.

I've personally never used ADNS so I cannot make any comparisons or anything,
but it would be interesting if you have any experiences from both camps and
perhaps lessons to learn from ADNS or similar.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on 2008-08-26