Subject: Re: c-ares API vs c-ares source code provided functions (Win32 recommended reading)

Re: c-ares API vs c-ares source code provided functions (Win32 recommended reading)

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:04:47 +0100 (CET)

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009, Yang Tse wrote:

>> What apps need/want these functions then? I mean, if we just decide to not
>> provide them to the outside world, who will be sad?
>
> I don't have that information, but affected users would be in the Win32 DLL
> camp.

Given the responses so far, I think we can simply not provide them at all
externally as a start.

If there appear people/apps later on who want them, we can take the discussion
then around why and possibly how.

-- 
  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on 2009-11-04