Subject: Re: CNAME following genericly

Re: CNAME following genericly

From: Daniel Black <daniel.subs_at_internode.on.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:01:05 +1100

On Monday 09 November 2009 18:04:50 Erik Kline wrote:

> Under what circumstances would you not want to follow CNAMEs (apart
> when that's forbidden or recommended against by some spec for a given
> RR type)?

going in loops, potentially excessive chain lengths however time-outs handle
that.

But apart from that, none that I know of.
Received on 2009-11-09