-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 06/17/2010 01:47 AM, Yang Tse wrote:
> There are plans in my personal TODO list to further improve current
> check, expanding it so that additionally a runtime check is performed
> at library initialization. This would make the check even more useful.
>
> I have not found yet a period of time to afford this. On the other
> hand July seems will give me some spare time that I could probably use
> for this. But take no promise here.
>
Daniel, Yang,
With the above said, is it better to patch the issue locally in our
distribution packages? I could do it either way, I would just like to
know where the upstream stands on the issue..if you were about to remove
the definitions from the headers, I would much prefer to use your patch
than distro-specific.
Thanks,
Jakub
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkwfQMIACgkQHsardTLnvCXN2gCeILCcGGNG27iA6SZ2avE561H2
XcYAoI26A7DzOVZF/meDwcfQa6JeUeMn
=8vdL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on 2010-06-21