Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>> In the same email as the patch, I also queried whether there was of
>> any interest with a ares_parse_naptr procedure or if this would only
>> bloat c-ares, as I'm assuming we're in quite the minority actually
>> using naptr records (seeing that they're for a quite specific use
>> case). If of any interest I can submit the routines we're using.
>
> I'm open for what people think. My gut feeling is that it is a feature
> that belongs in c-ares to make it more complete as a DNS library, so
> if there's no objection and you provide a patch... :-)
I agree.
-- Tommie Gannert