On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> My question is - should just the docs be amended such that ENODATA is a
> valid and expected return code, or should ares_gethostbyname() be changed so
> that it translates ENODATA into ENOTFOUND somehow?
As this is functionality that has been like this for quite some time already I
think it is better to update the docs to reflect the code rather than the
opposite.
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2011-06-13