Thinking about it, I have only one hacky idea for implementing it without
bloating the code base, or allocating excessive bytes.
The TTL could be put into the `len` field of record when `txt` is `NULL`.
Does it seems good to you guys?
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Fedor Indutny <fedor_at_indutny.com> wrote:
> Oh right, will do it.
>
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <saghul_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 05/27/2014 12:01 PM, Fedor Indutny wrote:
>> > Sure, here are attached changes.
>> >
>> > Please let me know if I should improve them even further.
>> >
>>
>> Looks good to me, FWIW.
>>
>> Someone asked if you could add the TTL data there, maybe taking the
>> same approach as ares_parse_a_reply? Something like:
>>
>> ares_parse_chunked_txt_reply (const unsigned char *abuf,
>> int alen,
>> struct ares_txt_reply **txt_out,
>> struct ares_addrttl *addrttls,
>> int *naddrttls)
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> - --
>> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
>> bettercallsaghul.com
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1
>> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
>>
>> iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThd2tAAoJEEEOVVOum8BZR9MP/RMgT5oqH4ZmSaQ41Zo9Igpe
>> qwy3SJm5YY/P/fa16uN2m7kJbyU5ksThUVj9c8PDA6fYecEqZTQMHY+we3UYOv1w
>> rwp2/GqAEv3Sx6fjdQ9Rm8KVwIDQRL8wb7DlxyMYiK+Oae18tokx/gFacEUA9g0F
>> ulH/uiBXgEnmDTq38H9rMTWn14PWbeHYl0XQNHDrGBAJkKuY+xnPmy+STG0ER5E0
>> dGIVfi2TgtEUhgnj6eyOqNLIV1cZDXBerUoIiXtVDejZNRSXE/Y59SPreCNgV+ZF
>> l43LPVbenP2EAlFUnZSq+OcD+/kQLuYs74jgSK5K2FyBMozhkLn84Vf/oDn8C9po
>> nVWpt8DmiJAlJ+QUkEU1s6SA6LWSF2ogN3ekTyFgN8buicNgS5B4xPFSqsU5E1IJ
>> eigEB1Wjvsz0bJDlfxi4ztNpd/5WK7mmiexO4HBXkY+RfbWpBBKvt6DkMjJsNtQa
>> XzvHsRIXIfzEp8/yigJ0gYhNkuOpaD4I5yTkbixVvbnd01dC7zON9sBNuCsqwnPj
>> dRQE5QauM28hUpkBLHtsMKGRclzOMVHGb1GKewX8qSPAFRoOHRGdVr786w8afYMe
>> /LZCWEJScohwq00X4JvT5qL8C6oWWqYrRXL93K1DK64tS1k5wyT/aN7F45RA1jLL
>> 8n+WOaaz6krHdWV3LF+Y
>> =vsvs
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
>
Received on 2014-06-06