On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 03:12:16PM +0700, Fedor Indutny wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I had a strange de-ja-vu about it, and I was right. I already did one patch
> like that in past.
>
> Anyway, I redid it - so including both old and new versions for your
> reviewal.
>
> Thank you,
> Fedor.
As a strange coincidence, I'm just writing a patch for SSSD that adds
the possibility to also read the TTL for SRV records. I think this is a
similar case.
So could we, instead of adding a feature-specific name, add a new
function with a less specific name (ares_parse_txt_ext() perhaps) that
would return new structure, but the structure would also have some more
data reserved for future use?
Received on 2014-12-10