Archive Index
This month's Index
Subject: Re: support for event-based loops (or workaround for FD_SETSIZE limit)
Re: support for event-based loops (or workaround for FD_SETSIZE limit)
From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel_at_haxx.se>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:49:15 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Daniel Hardman wrote:
> I would love to switch to an epoll-style approach. I found one interaction
We use one channel per lookup so for us that is not a restriction that causes
> And besides, I don't want to build up a list of file descriptors each time I
You don't need to build up a list of descriptors each time. In our case, we
> I also saw some posts back in Nov 2013 that floated the idea of supporting
I wouldn't mind adding a set of callbacks or something that tells the
> There are also some tantalizing hints that the curl team (including Daniel?)
We use the *getsock() for that, and we've done well over 50K parallel HTTP
> do you think I could solve my problem by simply creating multiple channels,
You can, and you don't have to limit it to 256 if you don't want to.
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2015-01-23 |