On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Brad House wrote:
> As far as I'm aware it was complete,
Sorry, but this quote from your email on September 1st:
"The exceptions that needed fixing are NS_IN6ADDRSZ, NS_INADDRSZ, and
CARES_MASK_{SHORT,USHORT,SINT,UINT,SLONG,ULONG} (which basically all systems
should have limits.h ... if not, there's still a fallback)."
What does that mean? What fixes were you talking about if the patch was
complete?
The 'ares_socklen_t' seems to be a particular problem in the current
ares_build.h file that sticks out. How does your suggested replacement look
for that that?
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2016-09-25