On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, David Drysdale wrote:
>> From another thread: presumably this also needs a CARES_VERSION_INFO
>> update?
> (Maybe move it along by 2 to allow for the fact that 1.11 didn't get a
> version bump).
I don't think bumping it more than one step serves any purpose so one should
be enough:
CARES_VERSION_INFO = -version-info 4:0:2
It makes the new output on linux become "libcares.so.2.2.0".
> More generally, I wonder if it might be worth writing down a checklist of
> what's involved in a new release?
Yeah it is. I forget this version number all the time...
-- / daniel.haxx.seReceived on 2016-09-29